Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Greenville News: Failure to set priorities

Millions shouldn't go to local projects while core needs aren't funded

Published: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 at 3:15 a.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 at 9:44 a.m.

A committee voted last week to give $10 million to a collection of lawmakers' pet projects despite the fact that the state budget is in trouble and lawmakers know they may have to come back to Columbia later this year to deal with shortfalls.

The committee spent $10 million of the $18 million in the Competitive Grants Program, which actually involves no competition. The program simply allocates money to the favored local projects of lawmakers.

Some of the money goes to worthwhile projects - expanding sewer and water service, for example. But much of it goes to festivals and similar activities - a mural and clock to celebrate Elgin's centennial, the Fall Festival and Professional Rodeo in Swansea.

These projects have to be seen as extras, as frills that should be cut in a tight budget year. But they weren't cut, and it's hard to see why.

At the last minute, lawmakers had to work out a deal to allocate enough money in the budget to cover fuel for the state's school buses. The amount of money allocated to the Department of Corrections won't be enough to run the state's prison system.

And lawmakers know that further trouble is on the way. Before they ended the legislative session, they passed a bill that will allow them to reconvene later this year to deal with budget shortfalls as they arise.

There is clearly not enough money to meet core state needs. Lawmakers should have taken the $18 million in the grants program and used it for those needs. At the very least, they should have instructed the committee that awards the grants to hold the money in reserve so lawmakers could use it if state revenues come up short.

But they did not. They wanted their pet projects funded regardless of the state's greater needs.

Gov. Mark Sanford urged the committee to refuse to award any grants, but the committee replied appropriately that this was the legislature's decision and they couldn't reverse that decision.

The fault lies not with the committee but with the General Assembly. It showed a remarkable lack of leadership in writing this budget. Lawmakers were unwilling to concentrate on the primary functions of state government and pare back the growth they've added to government over the past years. They are unwilling to put state resources where they are genuinely needed, not if it costs them the ability to buy votes with state-funded festivals and parades.

Monday, June 30, 2008

FITSNews: Lawmakers Get Their Pork Right After Elections

From FITSNews:

...Anyway, totaling $10 million, South Carolina’s first round of 2008 “competitive grant” awards are once again a hodge-podge of local goodies that have absolutely nothing to do with growing our state’s economy.


Seriously, can someone explain to us how spending $30,000 to fund “general operating expenses” at a privately-owned Dorchester County Children’s home is related to economic development?

We’ve got nothing against taking care of kids, but to call that a “competitive grant” is ridiculous.

But that’s just the beginning of the child care spree - there’s another $60,000 for a Children’s home in Clinton, S.C., $75,000 for the Sunshine House in Anderson, S.C., $45,000 for a new YMCA facility in Cherokee County, $74,551 to re-floor the YMCA gym in Laurens, S.C., and $65,000 to construct a child therapy center in Greenville.

Sadly, these are among the more justifiable expenses in what is otherwise an assortment of complete and total pork barrel garbage.

We’ve got the Sons of Confederate Veterans getting $5,000 to “educate” people about the “Battle of Anderson,” while the town of Liberty, S.C. gets $5,000 to reenact the “Battle of Central.”

Then there’s Rep. Cooper’s $100,000 haul for the “Great Southeast Balloon Festival” in Anderson, S.C., which is in addition to the $80,000 being spent on the “Freedom Weekend Aloft” balloon festival in Simpsonville, S.C.

There $20,000 for Sen. Leatherman’s hometown “Pecan Festival,” but we’ve also got $15,000 for the Pine Ridge, S.C. “Neighborhood Festival,” $12,000 for Spartanburg’s “FestiFall,” $18,000 for Conway, S.C.’s “Round the Fourth Festival,” $10,000 for the Lexington County Peach Festival (oh, and $30,000 to place some nice new trees along the side of the parade route in downtown Lexington). There’s also $8,000 for a rodeo in Swansea, and $20,000 for Greenville’s “Scottish games.”

Need a little Christmas cheer? Well, there’s $10,000 for “Christmasville,” an “outdoor walking art tour” in Rock Hill, and $10,000 for the Holly Hill, S.C., “Christmas Prelude” parade.

Of course it’s more than just festivals …

This batch of “competitive grants” also spends $24,000 to upgrade the “downtown circle fountain” in Barnwell, S.C., $30,000 to construct a Blacksville Heritage Museum, $30,000 to build a new garden in the town of Central, S.C., $35,000 to “Save the Chapin (S.C.) Theatre,” $28,000 to build a new “skate park” in Spartanburg, S.C., $15,000 to develop a “SC Rock Art Center” in Pickens County, $40,000 to build a “multi-functional sports complex” in Moncks Corner, S.C., $25,000 to repaint a water tower in Johnsonville, S.C. and $5,000 to “purchase (the) town mural and clock” to celebrate Elgin, S.C.’s centennial.

And let’s not forget the $20,000 lawmakers spent to refurbish tennis courts in the town of Coward, S.C. - a fitting name for the porkers who released these grants just two days after the elections.

These expenses - and dozens of others included within these ridiculous spending lines - are an affront to the taxpayers’ sensibilities under any circumstances, but they constitute nothing short of a slap in the taxpayers’ face during a declining revenue period.

To think we’re cutting budgets for prison guards and state troopers and fretting over having enough gas money for police cars and school buses while we’re funding this bullshit is truly depressing.

Spartanburg H-J: Elections Key to Influence

From the Spartanburg Herald-Journal:

The end of the 2008 primary season means more than it's safe to pick up the phone without the fear it's yet another political call. It means, no matter what happens in November, Spartanburg County's representation in Columbia is drastically altered. And it means 2009 is shaping up to be a strong year for Republican Gov. Mark Sanford and supporters of his agenda.

Much of the agenda is one that most Republicans agree on - less government, less spending and less taxes.

But it also is an agenda that includes issues that are extremely divisive in the Upstate - school choice and school district consolidation, for instance.

Going into November, voters likely will hear some of the same arguments used against candidates in the intense primary season. Think you've heard the last of "out-of-state special interests?" No chance.

The general election, too, will bring with it a slate of variables - from presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain's difficulty in connecting with die-hard conservatives to presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's difficulty in connecting with rural, white, working-class voters, and the surge of turnout expected for Obama.

Outgoing Spartanburg Rep. Doug Smith, who resigned as state House speaker pro tem this year, said he's glad he got out his way. The Upstate saw the beginnings of a strong anti-incumbency trend that he thinks could spread throughout the state.

And as last week's victory parties were winding down, political observers began warning the winners that not standing by the platform on which they were elected could spell doom after a single term.

"We had a strong delegation, and this delegation coming along will develop into a strong delegation," said Rita Allison, a Republican who had no primary opposition and, barring any write-in candidates, won't have any in November, either.

Though she served 10 years in the Statehouse before and subsequently worked for Sanford, she will begin the new legislative session as a freshman. She is against state-mandated school consolidation, but says tax credits for parents who choose to send their children to private school should be considered as long as it doesn't take money away from public education.

The highest-ranking members of Spartanburg's Legislative delegation, as it stands, are Democratic Sen. Glenn Reese, Republican Rep. Lanny Littlejohn and Democratic Rep. Harold Mitchell. Reese and Littlejohn both face challenges in November.

The Senate Republican Caucus will focus on protecting Republican seats in November and hasn't yet decided if it will be targeting any Democrats, like Reese, political director Wesley Donahue said.

The changing of the guard has brought up many questions about clout. But Allison looks at the newcomers - which, given the fall of so many incumbents, could potentially be from either party come November - and is optimistic.

"We were all new at one time," she said.

"And if they come in willing to learn, those of us who have been there before, we're certainly going to help. I was there for 10 years, and I'm still learning. Whether you've been there 20 years or you're the new kid on the block, things change, people change, life is changing. You learn to go with the change, and help develop that change so it suits the state as a whole."

For some, 2009 could resolve years of frustration - though others might feel even more frustrated than they have in the past.

Smith says he was "excited" when Sanford first took office, though as the governor was unable to push certain bills through the General Assembly, the tactics he employed led to constant bickering rather than discussion of the issues - and created a "herd" mentality that kept some legislators who would have otherwise supported his agenda from doing so.

Most of the changes next year will come in the Senate, which has more power to affect the governor's agenda. Three of the four Senate candidates Sanford supported - including Lee Bright from Roebuck, who has no opposition in November - won their races this month.

"I don't think you'll see this one-person-can-stop-legislation thing anymore," Smith said. "The governor has gone from a toehold to a foothold. It may be what it will do will give those who may have not been willing to jump out in front before, at least comfortably, the chance to do so, and he'll be there to back them up. That was always the Republicans' view, that they would get out there, and when the tide turned publicly, he gave up on them. A lot of them said, 'Where were you?' "

Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer says he thinks some of the governor's achievements are glossed over - from workers' compensation reform to tax relief for small businesses. Even though Sanford didn't get everything he wanted, Sawyer said, he got some of the things he wanted.

As for working with legislators, "We've tried several approaches to move the ball forward, from sitting down with individuals to holding news conferences to endorsing their opponents. We've tried everything from doing it their way to doing it our way. The problem you find with the General Assembly sometimes is that they try to make it about anything but the issue - they try to make it about the process," he said.

"It's like trying to deal with Goldilocks and the three bears, but there's no 'just right.' We became frustrated early on in the process, because there was never a way to do it the right way."

Sawyer says each year, Sanford gets closer to the "magic number" of legislators needed to sustain vetoes and push legislation forward.

He talks about the successes former Govs. Dick Riley and Carroll Campbell had in their second terms and says, "We think these last two years may be our most productive."

Democrats: Bring it on

Several Democratic candidates have said they hope Obama's name on the top of the ticket will bolster turnout in November - and their own chances at winning.

"He'll bring the party out in force," Spartanburg County Democratic Party Chairman Glenn Lindman said. "He's young. He's about change. He's tech-savvy. And he's running against John McCain, the perfect picture of the way things used to be."

But the effect of the Obama factor is hard to predict.

Sanford "likely" will get involved in November races, Sawyer said - something else Lindman is looking forward to.

"That will help us. Sanford's a polarizing person - even among Republicans. That's got to be splitting their party," he said. "I don't think they're going to be able to recruit their own moderate base enough to pull them over. These incumbents that are leaving, do you think they're going to use their influence to turn around and help that cause? I don't think so."

Republicans, on the other hand, say that many people came to their party out of convenience, and this year's primary was a "cleansing period" or "winnowing" of people who aren't truly dedicated to what the party stands for.

"That's why the right side is becoming a lot stronger, and it's going to make that line between right and left more defined than it has been for a number of years," Smith said. "That's why the moderates took it on the chin this time."

But conservatives are divided on school choice and school consolidation, issues close to Sanford's heart. On election day, for instance, Bright unveiled new campaign signs saying he opposed consolidation.

"That's something we're going to have to agree to disagree with Lee on," Sawyer said. "School consolidation is not a popular issue in Spartanburg County. We get that. Hopefully, someday we can convince the community that there is some benefit to it, like we did down in Sumter County."

Meanwhile, several groups supporting school choice poured tens of thousands of dollars into Spartanburg legislative races this year - though they spent more time talking about spending and other issues.

Those groups, like South Carolinians for Responsible Government, are tied to New York millionaire Howard Rich. The S.C. Club for Growth, Conservatives in Action and ReformSC are in the same boat.

"Two years ago, they might have scored a victory or two. This time, they really picked up some seats," Smith said. "I guess they've got the wind behind their sails right now. Any time that happens, they're not just going to drop the sail. They're going to keep the boat moving. Good, bad, right or wrong."

Many candidates on the receiving end of SCRG attacks - and even a few who benefited from them - pledged to support laws that would require such groups to disclose their financial information the same as other entities that affect elections. Sawyer said the governor's office welcomes a transparency bill, as long as it is across the board and part of a larger ethics reform package.

In the meantime, many of the same attacks used against groups like SCRG in the primary season will be repeated this fall.

"Our effort goes to our candidates and maintaining the influence of Spartanburg County in the state Legislature, which the Republicans wiped out this time," Lindman said. "And a lot of those people were good people - someone you could work with regardless of what side of the aisle they were on. We gave up on a tremendous amount of influence in the primary. Thankfully, it was mostly on the Republican side. But it's still bad for the county. The New York money doesn't give a damn about Spartanburg's influence. And if South Carolina's for sale, then Mark Sanford is the broker in charge."

The learning curve

Supposing Republican newcomers win in November, the county party is already providing crash courses on surviving in Columbia, including speech, issue and debate training.

Spartanburg County GOP Chairman Rick Beltram said he is working with all of his party's nominees to make sure they are prepared to hold office - and as a pre-emptive measure against any Democratic attacks.

"These in-bound folks need to be clear on their agenda," Beltram said. "There were a lot of promises made that these folks won on, and I can assure them that if they change from that, they will be targeted very quickly."

He cites Rep. Keith Kelly, who enjoyed the support of SCRG two years ago only to feel their wrath this go-round.

Smith and Allison said the most important thing the new legislative delegation can do is learn to work together - quickly. Both recalled experiences in which the delegation was uncooperative, which slowed or stopped much of what its members were trying to do individually.

Sawyer offered this piece of advice: "Just don't forget who put you there and don't forget why you're there."

Beltram said he's lobbying Statehouse leadership to make sure the Spartanburg delegation is "fairly treated." He's convinced there are enough open seats that, coupled with the level of activity here, the "no clout" argument holds no merit.

He points to three candidates - Steve Parker, Joey Millwood and Shane Martin - as starting out on the precinct level. He says Martin, in particular, will help the party win over Democrats who won't support Obama.

"We have seen a complete paradigm shift in 2008 in this county," Beltram said. "We've seen a complete shift to a bottom-up view, where a lot of these candidates were activists within the party, which has not been the case in the past. I think Spartanburg County voters … can think that any shift toward the Democrats has been reversed with passion."

Smith wonders how the anti-incumbency wave will play in November. Incumbents should not take any opposition for granted, he said.

He added: "The governor, he may not have won all of his races, but he won enough … where there's a clear message to the Senate that there's going to need to be some leadership changes. It could happen in the House, too. Spartanburg always seems to be the first to be in a progressive place, as far as politics. We were one of the first all-Republican counties in the state, or near-all Republican. That means that some areas of the state might be behind us in timing, that the exact same thing can happen there that happened in Spartanburg. It's coming."

Monday, June 9, 2008

Piggy Visits North Myrtle Beach!

Piggy Visits Myrtle Beach!

Piggy Visits Pawley's Island!

Piggy Visits North Charleston!